A little strings theory against the Atheists..


Context of the Dialogue:
This discussion took place at one of the artifact posted by the community of atheists from face book. Initially the author engaged them by showing them the weakness of the secular system implemented in the west. The atheists are usually in a illusion that mankind can achieve excellence without religion. However, they failed to realize what einstein already had summarized a century ago
“Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.” – Albert Einstein
The main discussion started when an atheist jumped in and the conversation initiated. He claimed to be a Ph. D in physics from Melbourne university, Australia. You will surely notice, how righteous was he in is claims. I have not met in my whole life any person who has reached the zenith of prevailing scientific study and demonstrating such ethical behavior which is not acceptable even from children of descent families. The author is pretty sure that he just lied and must not be more then a bachelors in the physics.
Actual Conversation:
  • Nauman نعمان Civilized countries report their rapes. Muslim countries don’t.And any of that doesn’t proves the existence of your Allah, or any of the other supernatural claims of your pedophile prophet.about an hour ago · Like · 1
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui the followers of 17th century may have 10000000000 rapes.. not arguing..

    why the most civilized people have 90,000 rapes every year ????

    is that there level of respect for women?

    is 21st century any better?
  • Nauman نعمان Pointing out problems in secular countries doesn’t hides yours which are way greater in number. The Facebook that you’re using right now was invented by an atheist of Jewish origins.
  • Nauman نعمان Until the day you can bring forth testable evidence of the existence of your claimed deity, we’ll all keep on laughing at your gullibility.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui The technology i m using, i m paying for it. just like you are paying for oil 

    By the way… every new technology is based on the work of previous nations

    check it out what Islam gave the world ..

    https://bittertruthpk.wordpress.com/2012/12/01/muslim-contribution-to-the-world-of-science/

    bittertruthpk.wordpress.com

      Diagram of a solar eclipse / From The Wonders of Creation and the Oddities of …See More
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui so you have the intellect of a 6 years old school boy who laughs at the world’s greatest scientists?

    “Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.” – Albert Einstein
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui you are in basic error !

    Since you will never be able to acquire the intellect of einstein ever therefore you will never reach to his conclusions …

  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui “God does not play dice with the universe.” – Albert Einstein

    “Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.” – Albert Einstein

    “I want to know God’s thoughts…the rest are details.” – Albert Einstein

    “I cannot conceive of a personal God who would directly influence the actions of individuals, or would directly sit in judgment on creatures of his own creation. I cannot do this in spite of the fact that mechanistic causality has, to a certain extent, been placed in doubt by modern science. [He was speaking of Quantum Mechanics and the breaking down of determinism.] My religiosity consists in a humble admiration of the infinitely superior spirit that reveals itself in the little that we, with our weak and transitory understanding, can comprehend of reality. Morality is of the highest importance — but for us, not for God.” – Albert Einstein ‘The Human Side’, 1954

    “Subtle is the Lord, but malicious He is not.” – Albert Einstein

    “Strange is our situation here upon this earth. Each of us comes for a short visit, not knowing why, yet sometimes seeming to a divine purpose.” – Albert Einstein

    “There remains something subtle, intangible and inexplicable. Veneration for this force beyond anything that we can comprehend is my religion.” – Albert Einstein

    “Human beings, vegetables, or cosmic dust, we all dance to a mysterious tune intoned in the distance by an invisible player.” – Albert Einstein

    “Do you believe in immortality? No, and one life is enough for me.” – Albert Einstein

    “Scientists were rated as great heretics by the church, but they were truly religious men because of their faith in the orderliness of the universe.” – Albert Einstein

    “I do not believe that the Good Lord plays dice.” – Albert Einstein

    “When the solution is simple, God is answering.” – Albert Einstein
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui @ Ghulam Rasool 

    You have objected at the history of mankind in your passage. 
    In order to grab your problem from its root, 
    the discussion will go back to the God His Signs and His Concept
    Having faith in God, every thing will be explained instantly.
  • Nauman نعمان You retard, Einstein was a non believing Jew. In his quite he wasn’t talking about religion faith. Try to get a decent education first & then come back for your typical Muslim style copy / paste.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui Nauman.. stop calling other retards, read and absorb. question about authenticity of einstien quotes!. Talk logically not emotionally.
  • Nauman نعمان There is nothing more funny to see than desis trying to hopelessly defend Arab myths!! Lol.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui read einstien quotes and come back. you seems like a kid i m wasting time with
  • Nauman نعمان Logically, alright. Simple. Feel free to follow an ancient illiterate Bedouin pedophile all you want. You’re wasting your existence, not ours.
    There is zero evidence for the existence of your imaginary Allah. And that’s a fact no copy paste of yours can refute.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui mr arrogant .. answer to your response is present in the sayings of Einstein. if you are so arrogant not to read, its your problem.
  • Nauman نعمان A kid? Gosh you idiots. I’ve got a PhD in Physics from University of Melbourne. And you think you can lecture me on Einstein. Lol. Epic.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui Ph.D. on physics is not a sign that your have conquered your narrow mindness.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui It takes a big heart to be humble and understand other’s point of view.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui Have you done your Ph.D in entire physics or some particular field of research ?
  • Nauman نعمان What Einstein did or did not say in any context whatsoever has no bearing unless it is validated by testable evidence. It’s called the scientific method. I pity you. It’s not your fault. You were indoctrinated from the cradle to defend the Arab myths even though you’re not one.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui you behaved like a Kid. if ph.d in physics have some mark on their faces, an idiot like me could have figured it out. so a wise can person can tell about the degrees one hold, by just seeing at his display photo?
  • Nauman نعمان Listen kiddo, I’ve got a busy day ahead of me. But here’s do free education for you that you don’t find in desi-land.
    The only way you can prove the existence of your Muhammad’s claimed Allah is by bringing forth evidence that can be tested to directed establish that claim. Nothing else. No copy paste of twisted quotes proves your Allah to be real.
    I honestly do feel sorry for the fact that you were not able to get a decent education & were indoctrinated into this barbaric Bedouin cult from birth.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui Good. now you understand that its not the science his mankind should conquer but small oneself that is required to be conquered.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui I was willing to talk you some thing about the M Theory…
  • Ayzee Kashmiri hahahahaha this is funny shit
  • Nauman نعمان These Buddha style statements of yours don’t prove the existence of your Allah. Really? Are you this gullible? Gosh.
  • Ayzee Kashmiri I dont think u should waste ur time nauman
  • Ayzee Kashmiri these ppl r used to talking out of their backsides
  • Ayzee Kashmiri just like their prophet
  • Nauman نعمان Alright it’s 7:30am here & I gotta start getting ready for the day ahead. If you wanna talk to me then PM me or something later, kid. Well wishes from an ex muslim. Cheers.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui after the 11th dimensional equations, you will need another Big Bang to know who did the multi-verse. Keep wasting yourlife.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui While i see you taking 50% risk with your life, i feel sympathy for your playing dice with the death. you will come here and carry on discussion. you will become as weak as you were in the womb. so be wise because its too late. Good morning.
  • Nauman نعمان And your answer for all of that is Muhammad’s Allah? Not even any other deity! Really??? This stupid??? Seriously???
  • Nauman نعمان Anything science cannot YET understand, the answer by default is Muhammad’s Allah. Why? Because Muhammad said so!
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui being a physics and mathematician i hope you will sincerly accept the fact that 
    50% chance that there is some after life
    50% chance the afterlife is a shit..

    isn’t ??
    Can you use all the knowledge in physics that you have acquired to prove that there is no after life.. or there is ? !!!
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui see here is… you said “Science can not yet understand”!!

    So my point of view is that..

    Whats the harm in reducing risks of your after life by just accepting
    “There is a God”

    A single belief can reduce your chances from 50% to almost 0% !!
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui aren’t wise people rational? and isn’t the smart people are those who do not take any risks or take only calculated risks !.. but you have no calculation to influence the normal distribution of chances that you are playing with.. 

    Science has 0% knowledge of Soul and afterlife !
  • Nauman نعمان Can you prove that the aliens didn’t abduct your Muhammad in the 7th century & butt fucked him ten times?
    You can’t, right. So is there a 50% chance that its true?
    No you idiot, logic doesn’t works like that. This is not statistics.
    Again, for goodness’s sake, try to get a decent education first.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui Please answer me on thing sincerely ! its your professional ethics and not personal ego at stake right now… 

    My last question before i also leave only to catch you later and to get more knowledge from you.

    Q.
    once you mastered the framework of 11th dimensional multi-verse and prove that the big bang was not the beginning but just another billionth incident in the multiverse … don’t you think … another set of 22th dimensional multiverse may be possible to encompass all that..

    A tiny string that vibrates not just in the 11th dimensional hyperspace but in the 22th ?? .. and so. on… ??

    would’t you escape from one question and rather stuck into another
    “who initiated the multi-verse”

    can you use mathematical equations to bound that infinite possibility? a higher dimensional framework summing up and explaining all the phenomenon that happen within it????

    please don’t accept here.. just in you heart.. that

    Science will never run of that never-ending tom n jerry’s play with God.

    in short.
    just claim that after the 11th dimensional framework of String’s theory, no higher framework shall confine the underlying framework within it.

    if you, please explain through equations. i will be grateful to learn
  • Nauman نعمان How do you establish that there is an afterlife? What testable evidence do you have to establish it to be true?
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui : ) again .. please adopt the humbleness and patience of the great scientists like einstien and Dr. Michu kaku.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui Nauman.. i am student of physics, you are a Ph.D
    give me straight answer to my question. no hanky panky. 
    please be sincere to your profession while doing that.
  • Nauman نعمان What initiated singularity? And the answer is again, Muhammad’s Allah, no one else. Wow. Awesome logic!!!!!! Please collect your Noble Prize.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui since i m a student i m bound to ask stupid question, being Ph.D you should tolerate my stupidity and humbly explain your response to my questoin posted above.
  • Nauman نعمان I’m gonna start driving now, on my way to work. PM if you want some free physics lessons. Discussing theoretical physics with a brainwashed desi with a poor education will take time.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui no please take your time. come back here, i want the audience to get benefit from particularly your reply and to appreciate my quest for knowledge.

    ok. you will always find me awaiting.

    Your student
    Ammar.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui I am the worst person, i am the desi, i am a poor i m a 17th century jerk. but i am sure, i will not find any one better then you, to get satisfactory answer. you can not just explain me in simple words but also provide me references to latest research or publication in the field of M Theory where i can exactly find the equations that will make it clear that there will no be no 22th dimensional framework possible after the completion of M’s theory.
  • Nauman نعمان Here’s a question for you. Even if for arguments sake, just suppose there is a creator. How does that establish that it has to be only Muhammad’s Allah, and not any other creator. On what basis did you choose this particular god over several others.
  • Nauman نعمان And I’m not running a charity here to educate everyone. It’s not my job . I only offered to educate you since you’re so keen on learning physics.
  • Nauman نعمان Theoretical Physics is not the same as proving Muhammad’s supernatural claims. As an ex Muslim my focus here is on exposing Muhammad’s scam, applied physics is my profession. They are two totally different things.
  • Nauman نعمان Muhammad never spoke of physics. He was an illiterate & a barbarian.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui Nauman, you have unconciously accepted your weakness. even the Dr. Michu Kaku the most prominenet inventor of M theory can not answer to what i just asked. All the great minds together, can not answer what i just asked. they will keep ask men to focus on the narrow spectrum of illusion they create that know pretty much.. just like we are bounded in such a vast universe, so does over understanding.
  • Nauman نعمان You idiot, I already told you that there is much to learn in physics that we yet don’t understand. The answer to all that we yet don’t understand is not Muhammad’s Allah by default.
    You really can’t understand that? What is wrong with your education system!
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui so coming back .. in other word, you are taking 50% risk of afterlife.. on one hand you claim that you have a lot to learn and understand, but when its about afterlife, you are confident as if you know every thing. 

    is this the rational behavior ??
  • Nauman نعمان It’s not a 50% risk. That’s not how statistics works!!
    I’ll trust for what there is testable evidence present. For what there isn’t, I’ll stay skeptical. Simple.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui Please boldly choose one option

    a) we humbly accept that our knowledge is very limited and yet a lot to explore and discover and understand !.. so we are not sure about afterlife !.. and we are playing 50% chance of dice game with our afterlife !

    b) we know every thing, and today after i come back from office, i will give you a link to some online publication of physics where it will be proved that after 11th dimensional framework, a 22th dimensional framework will not be possible to encompass the 11th dimensional one

    please boldly accept one !
  • Nauman نعمان Both your choices are wrong. How twisted your thought process is?
    There has been absolutely zero evidence to date to suggest the existence of an afterlife, thus there is no scientific way to calculate the probability of its occurrence in absence of any related data.
    And until the time any testable evidence presents itself to support this unscientific supernatural claim, I’m inclined to remain highly skeptical.
  • Nauman نعمان And again, even if someday science proves the existence of a creator, you will still have the burden to prove that it’s Muhammad’s claimed god Allah, and not any of the other ones proposed.
    And btw who created your god? No one? Then why can’t you assume the same for the multiverse paradigm?
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui Please do not be unjust to your profession.

    There has been zero evidence about after life ! [50%]
    there has been zero evidence about absence of after life ! [50%]

    Both are totally mutually exclusive and both have equal chances.

    i don’t find any simpler words and logic to refute your response.

    The Scientific method….and evidence???

    you claimed that you knew einstien far better but you are not mentioning the very crux of his theory of relativity !

    That even TIME which think absolute is relative and dependent on the speed of the sun (solar system) we live in. 

    he also concluded that scientific experiments that we perform in the cage of time and space are right but the conclusions we draw from them are only illusion and can not be verified unless we go out of the time and space cage.
  • Nauman نعمان You’re totally confusing theoretical cosmological physics with proving the existence of a very specific supernatural deity. You don’t believe in any god, but only Muhammad’s god Allah that your parents taught you about.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui Well : ) i have not come to the ALLAH and Mohammad part .. the ball is in my court to present what religion should be accepted as from GOD and on what basis… 

    but before dwelling into that subject, i want you to relax, and first conclude from our current discussion, so that next time we don’t keep moving to and fro like pendulem. I am deliberately avoiding to come on to subject to do justice with and properly conclude the on-going subject.

    please do not worry, you will always find me reasoning with atheists on these posts : ) i have become great friend of Sir zulfiqar that despite of my several head on collisions with him, i am still in his friends list.
  • Nauman نعمان The burden of proof lies with the party making the claim, not the other way around. You are claiming an afterlife, you have to establish it being true.
    I’m claiming that your Muhammad is being butt fucked by the devil now every day. Since you can’t disprove my ridiculous claim, so there is a 50% chance for it to be true.
    Do you now realize how twisted & flawed your logic is!!
    And if you still don’t, then I’m just wasting my time with yet another delusional slave of the Arabian myth.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui please do not accuse with emotional sentiments. save words and just write logic and reasoning : )
  • Nauman نعمان Yes I know your avoiding to talk about the evidence for the existence of your Muhammad’s very specific claimed deity, Allah. That’s what all Muslims do. Because there isn’t any. Nothing new here.
    I’m gonna start working now. No use trying to knock sense into someone that thinks an ancient illiterate pedophile knew fuck all.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui Conciously or Un conciously you have done following

    1. Acceptane of 50 50 theory
    2. Accepted inability to answer my question
    3. acceptance of limitations of science
    4. Shown Lack of ethics required for such a discussion
    5. deliberately denying theory of relativity.

    be free to do your work. you will never find me using bad words about you as i am believe in GOD and i know if i hurt you or disgrace you, i will be questioned on day of judgement. 

    having this set, let us move towards another stage, which i was deliberately avoiding. you can continue your tasks what you are doing, my next post will take a while. you can reply when ever you wish.
  • Nauman نعمان Logic & reasoning. Mate, given how twisted yours is, I’ll have a better chance trying to knock sense into a turd.
  • Nauman نعمان You’re just trying to pet yourself in the back, nothing else. Go learn statistics first to begin with. It’s not a 50-50 chance with any relevant data. Then come other with physics. And before any of that, go get your head checked. Islam has rot your brain. You’re making the most retarded unscientific assumptions I’ve ever seen anyone make. I don’t know if I should laugh at you, or feel sorry for you. Or perhaps both.
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui What is the color of a nebula seen from the naked eye from the earth?
  • Nauman نعمان Here we were talking about Muhammad the scammer and you jump into M theory. You totally avoid my questions on the subject & then try to accuse me of skipping yours.
  • Nauman نعمان Nebulas? What has that got to do with Muhammad’s claims?
    Seriously, which lunatic asylum have you escaped from?
    This is not normal!!!
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui Nauman.. how pathetic it seems when a Ph.D. in physics accuses and shows hatred to others, while a little student in physics and religion, shows humbleness and respect to other.. have’t you felt the difference yet
  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui Listen.. so far you should have gained some confidence that the person talking to at least know some thing which has kept you engaged for an hour.. please use all your scientific knowledge, ,and answer me

    “What is the color of a nebulae when seen from the naked eye from earth?”
    • Conciously or Un conciously you have done following

      1. Acceptane of 50 50 theory
      2. Accepted inability to answer my question
      3. acceptance of limitations of science
      4. Shown Lack of ethics required for such a discussion
      5. deliberately denying theory of relativity.

      be free to do your work. you will never find me using bad words about you as i am believe in GOD and i know if i hurt you or disgrace you, i will be questioned on day of judgement. 

      having this set, let us move towards another stage, which i was deliberately avoiding. you can continue your tasks what you are doing, my next post will take a while. you can reply when ever you wish.
    • Nauman نعمان Logic & reasoning. Mate, given how twisted yours is, I’ll have a better chance trying to knock sense into a turd.
    • Nauman نعمان You’re just trying to pet yourself in the back, nothing else. Go learn statistics first to begin with. It’s not a 50-50 chance with any relevant data. Then come other with physics. And before any of that, go get your head checked. Islam has rot your brain. You’re making the most retarded unscientific assumptions I’ve ever seen anyone make. I don’t know if I should laugh at you, or feel sorry for you. Or perhaps both.
    • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui What is the color of a nebula seen from the naked eye from the earth?
    • Nauman نعمان Here we were talking about Muhammad the scammer and you jump into M theory. You totally avoid my questions on the subject & then try to accuse me of skipping yours.
    • Nauman نعمان Nebulas? What has that got to do with Muhammad’s claims?
      Seriously, which lunatic asylum have you escaped from?
      This is not normal!!!
    • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui Nauman.. how pathetic it seems when a Ph.D. in physics accuses and shows hatred to others, while a little student in physics and religion, shows humbleness and respect to other.. have’t you felt the difference yet
    • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui Listen.. so far you should have gained some confidence that the person talking to at least know some thing which has kept you engaged for an hour.. please use all your scientific knowledge, ,and answer me

      “What is the color of a nebulae when seen from the naked eye from earth?”
    • Nauman نعمان My attitude has nothing to do with proving the existence of your Muhammad’s claimed deity, Allah?
      You can act all nice or crazy you want, that doesn’t establish your pedophile prophet’s supernatural claims to be true.
      We are not friends. I don’t even k…See More
    • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui “What is the color of a nebulae when seen from the naked eye from earth?”
    • Nauman نعمان You really expect me to spend my entire Friday with you talking about things that have got nothing to do with Muhammad’s supernatural claims.
      Seriously mate, you’re not normal. Get your head checked. I’m saying this in all sincerity now. Take care. G’dday.
    • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui are you a physics Ph.D. such knowledge should be at tips of your finger. com on budy save time, proceed quickly
    • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui one quick linker..

      What is the color of nebulae when seen from the earth?
    • Nauman نعمان Kid, I was here to talk about Muhammad’s claim for the last fucking time.
      Why should I jump to astronomy now with you?
      And then what’s next? Geography?
    • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui a simple answer .. which should be at the tip of your finger.. why you are not able to answer it ?
    • Nauman نعمان Fucking retarded Muslims. Really. Why do I even bother.
      If you had one ounce of sense in you, you won’t be a Muslim to begin with.
      Talking about Muhammad, jumps to astronomy. Just like that. Lol.
    • Nauman نعمان Tell me the average rotational speed of a pulsar? Quick answer it.
    • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui Nauman its a shame on you if you waste time in useless things but not answer to a single question

      go google it and give me a reference quick.
    • Nauman نعمان Do you see how retarded it is.
    • Nauman نعمان What had that got to do with the topic of Muhammad’s supernatural claimed deity Allah.
    • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui alright.. you dont have an attutide of a high school graduate.. keep aside being Ph.d in Phsysics…
    • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui Let me help you.
    • Nauman نعمان I’m not going to bother. All I tried to do is knock logical sense into you, when it comes to Muhammad’s ridiculous claims. And you like a typical Muslim defected the original topic.
    • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui Can we see nebulae from naked eye on earth?

      Answer:

      Nebulae is the plural of nebula (so you don’t say nebulas but nebulae). Nebulae are in colour, but our eyes are not sensitive enough to see it. So to us they look like faint smudges of white/grey light. In big telescopes, the brightest nebula can show a little colour. But to see the colours properly you need to take a long-exposure photo.
    • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui If you just put your eye to the telescope they are in black and white.

      The reason is the way your eye works, there are two kinds of “pixels” at the back of the eye called rods and cones.

      The cones are mostly in the middle of the eye and make fine det…See More
    • Nauman نعمان Oh so this is what you’re trying to do. I called out the bullshit of your pedophile prophet so you’re trying to discredit me by calling me a liar. Wow!! You genius.
    • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui my big respectable brother, you could have googled it.. A Ph.D should be smart enough to catch the point.
    • Nauman نعمان Omg, mister crazy. THST HAS NOTHING TO DO with your prophet’s fake claims.
      I’m happy that you’re studying physics and you’re all excited about it. But it had nothing to do with the original topic.
    • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui Now that you have understood finaly : ) what i was asking… so i take responsibility : ) cuz i m the small dirty 17th century filthy : ).. no problem.. i seek honor only in the sight of my creator… i can bear any insult or disgrace : )

      __________________________________-
    • Nauman نعمان I don’t have to jump topics with you talking all day on unrelated matters. Are you seriously crazy? Is this how discussions work in your part of the world?
    • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui This Hubble Space Telescope image shows one of the most complex planetary nebulae ever seen, NGC 6543, nicknamed the ‘Cat’s Eye Nebula.’ Hubble reveals surprisingly intricate structures including concentric gas shells, jets of high-speed gas and unusual shock-induced knots of gas. Estimated to be 1, 000 years old, the nebula is a visual ‘fossil record’ of the dynamics and late evolution of a dying star.
    • Nauman نعمان Your last statement didn’t even make any sense. My 10yr old nephew can construct better coherent sentences than that.
    • Nauman نعمان This Hubble telescope image? Huh? Which image?
      THAT’S A COPY PASTE.!!!’ Typical muzzie!! Lol.
    • Nauman نعمان Lol. Now people are looking at me funny laughing out so uncontrollable. People from your part of the world provide the best comedy!!
    • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui How did mohammed managed to describe the exact shape of a dying star – specially the red eye nebula?

      This is my third question to you.
    • Nauman نعمان Ok I need to stop laughing & start working. Try & stay safe.
    • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui you failed the audience the third time !…
      running away without answering the third question.
    • Nauman نعمان Muhammad also said a lot of other crap that has proven to be outright false.
      Again, that doesn’t proves anything!!!
      Ok, enough of wasting my time. Tc.
    • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui  
      God is great.
    • Nauman نعمان Failed the audience? What audience? Huh? Omg, what’s wrong with you, seriously?
    • Nauman نعمان It always either end in Allah Akbar (god in great) or ill fuck your sister. Convieniently avoid all the other ridiculous crap Muhammad said which has proven to be totally untrue. Typical desi slave of an Arab myth!!!!!’
    • Nauman نعمان Ok I’m gone now. Say hi to your imaginary audience on my behalf. Lol.

  • Ammar Ahmed Siddiqui You have’t discussed with me all your issues yet. you can not claim any thing until you ask those questions. and you need to engage in more discussions, if you really are truthful. People will know who showed narrowness of mind !

    THERE IS NO GOD BUT HIM.

    May Allah guide us.

    I apologize for any words that i said that may have hurt you. keep safe.

red eye nebula

Red Eye Nebula – The Photo of Dying Star taking from the Hubble Telescope, stationed in the universe

This Hubble Space Telescope image shows one of the most complex planetary nebulae ever seen, NGC 6543, nicknamed the ‘Cat’s Eye Nebula.’ Hubble reveals surprisingly intricate structures including concentric gas shells, jets of high-speed gas and unusual shock-induced knots of gas. Estimated to be 1, 000 years old, the nebula is a visual ‘fossil record’ of the dynamics and late evolution of a dying star
    See >>  Hubble

This picture of the “Cat’s Eye Nebula,” taken on September 18, 1994, by the NASA Hubble Space Telescope is officially referred to as NGC 6543. Estimated to be 1,000 years old, the nebula is a visual “fossil record” of the dynamics and late evolution of a dying star. NGC 6543 is an exploding star 3,000 light-years away in the northern constellation Draco.

They should have called it the “Oily Red Rose Nebula.” As the Qur’aan states in Surat ar-Rahman (chapter 55), “When the sky is torn apart, so it was (like) a red rose, like ointment.” How would the Quran know 1,400 years ago that when a star explodes, it is like a oily red rose?

 

References:

  1. http://www.alberteinsteinsite.com/quotes/einsteinquotes.html
  2. http://alquraan.co.uk/#/the-cats-eye-nebula/4554927629
  3. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20100611215525AAqqxfo
  4. http://www.seasky.org/celestial-objects/nebulae.html